After announcing plans to launch a new privacy coin called GHOST, John McAfee has received numerous accusations of plagiarizing the whitepaper.
The popular cryptocurrency proponent responded today to the emanated controversy, calling it a “storm in a teacup.”
GHOST Controversy
As CryptoPotato reported in mid-April, the former anti-virus software tycoon announced the upcoming launch of the new privacy coin GHOST. Outside of the website promising fast, cheap, and entirely anonymous transactions, details regarding the coin were quite limited at the time.
Just recently, however, the team behind the GHOST token published the whitepaper. Almost immediately, though, it began attracting serious waves of controversy.
PIVX, another privacy coin which initially came as a fork of DASH, accused McAfee and his team of plagiarizing the GHOST whitepaper.
PIVX provided several screenshots illustrating the similarities between a 2018 version of their whitepaper with GHOST’s current one. PIVX ultimately concluded that “at least 20 of the 26 total pages found in the GHOST whitepaper contain material directly plagiarized from the 2018 PIVX whitepaper.”
PIVX also said that they are working on a new privacy protocol, Sapling/zk-SNARKs, which is currently being implemented. This could impact the GHOST token if it’s, in fact, a fork of PIVX:
“PIVX expects to complete the implementation of the new Sapling/zk-SNARKs privacy protocol in Q4 2020. As such, if GHOST is indeed a fork of PIVX, it will either be waiting for PIVX to complete the privacy code or will use its own solution.”
GHOST Team And McAfee Respond
A recent Medium post from the team behind GHOST basically confirmed that the starting codebase of the new privacy coin “is a fork of PIVX.” Thus, it’s natural that the “technical explanations and processes are, of course, going to be essentially the same.”
The post also informed that the development of the GHOST whitepaper was outsourced to a group of developers outside the internal core team. Yet, they admit that “we should have taken more time to develop the whitepaper and explain more about the changes and additions we are making.” The GHOST team also apologized to PIVX for “any misunderstandings.”
McAfee himself responded today, staying true to his direct style. He said that such actions are often occurring in the blockchain space and people should not make a big uproar about it:
The $GHOST controversy is storm in a teacup.
Forking an existing blockchain is a common occurrence, ex: Bitcoin to BTC, etc.
The developers of the original blockchain always kick up a fuss. It’s the way of the world.
This is a triviality folks. Get over it.
— John McAfee (@officialmcafee) May 19, 2020
Later on, McAfee corrected himself, saying that he meant the Bitcoin Cash hard fork.
The post John McAfee Explains GHOST Plagiarism Comparing It To Bitcoin to BCH Forks appeared first on CryptoPotato.
The post appeared first on CryptoPotato
